Steve: Buff Steve, too many small words to read in the article!. From what I read I didn't see much relevance in the article to my practise. This doesn't mean in any way that the article was not interesting to some audience. I've heard before critiques of all kinds made against most of religions and not skillfully representants from them. I see no difference from other spiritual instituons notorious exemples as in the essence always comes to the same. There is people of all kinds in all spiritual traditions and the most important is to see what is going to be relevant towards our evolution in the practise rather than to pay more attention than the necessary one to all the shadows in institutions and representants. But, I don't know...who knows and it might be an article that gives a warning and bring benefits to all those who blindly follows whatever Teacher tells them to follow. Thank you for posting it, anyway. Mayka --- On Sat, 19/2/11, SteveW <[email protected]> wrote:
From: SteveW <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Zen] An Article of Interest To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, 19 February, 2011, 16:32 --- In [email protected], Maria Lopez <flordeloto@...> wrote: > > I beg you pardon Steve. There is a for and against in this very, very > huge long and rethoric article. Not much for simplicity though. > > > Hi Maria. Yes, there is always a for and against in every situation. I did not write this article. It does, however, seem to be well supplied with foot-notes if you care to check the veracity of all his statements, which I have not done. Steve > > > > > > > > > >
