Mike,
The outcomes of self-enquiry cannot be communicated without a common understanding of key words used in describing the outcomes. It appears silly to talk so seriously about subjects when we we do not have a common agreement about what we are talking about. --ED --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote: > > ED, > > I'd prefer self-inquiry over a wiki search, but yes, that definition will do ; ) > > Mike > Mike, > You use this definition of 'ego', yes? > In spirituality, and especially nondual, mystical and eastern meditative > traditions, the human being is often conceived as being in the illusion of > individual existence, and separated from other aspects of creation. ... > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_(spirituality) > --ED > > ED, > > > > Yes, it is a Self-evident truth for those who have insight into the question > > 'Who am I?' or who have stopped falsely identifying with the ego. If there is > >no > > > > individual self and no thing that stands outside of existence - then what is > > left? I guess this is a bit of a trick question as we can't say what it is > >(what > > > > is named the Tao, isn't the Tao) - we can only work by negation (what we're > > not). > > > > Mike
