Mike,
You use this definition of 'ego', yes? In spirituality, and especially nondual, mystical and eastern meditative traditions, the human being is often conceived as being in the illusion of individual existence, and separated from other aspects of creation. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_(spirituality) <http://www.google.com/url?q=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_(spiritual\ ity)&sa=X&ei=X-lrTaKVMoeosAOAm-ymBA&ved=0CBoQpAMoAg&usg=AFQjCNGbBFhbHzna\ 56I9b6lh7IcWm6Hthw> --ED --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote: > > ED, > > Yes, it is a Self-evident truth for those who have insight into the question > 'Who am I?' or who have stopped falsely identifying with the ego. If there is no > individual self and no thing that stands outside of existence - then what is > left? I guess this is a bit of a trick question as we can't say what it is (what > is named the Tao, isn't the Tao) - we can only work by negation (what we're > not). > > Mike
