ED, The label can mean everything.. and nothing, depending on who is writing or reading it. After all, a truth given is a truth that cannot be given. But if you're looking for an answer from me, then yes, this label 'works'. The contradictory answer, however, is also correct.
Mike ________________________________ From: ED <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, 5 March, 2011 5:45:46 Subject: [Zen] Re: What is the equivalent of 'pure awareness' in Zen? Hi Steve, Mike and Bill, Is 'non-dual awareness' an appropiate label? --ED > --- In [email protected], mike brown uerusuboyo@ wrote: > > > > Steve, > > > > And that is why I answered, "Awareness only" in reply to ED's previous >question. > > > 'Awareness only' isn't some samadhi trance-like state, but is exactly like >"no > > > bell, no 'I', just ringing". Things still happen, life carries on but > > simply > > that there is no I 'doing' anything (wu-wei... as opposed to woo-woo!). > > > > Mike
