ED, It's just 'awareness', it's not 'non-dual awareness'. That would be a dualistic term. It implies there are many kinds of (dual awareness, good awareness, bad awareness, etc...). We're not talking about that here. Just 'awareness'. Like just 'bong! - not I hear the bell ring.
--- In [email protected], "ED" <seacrofter001@...> wrote: > > > > > Hi Steve, Mike and Bill, > > Is 'non-dual awareness' an appropiate label? > > --ED > > > > --- In [email protected], mike brown uerusuboyo@ wrote: > > > > > > Steve, > > > > > > And that is why I answered, "Awareness only" in reply to ED's > previous question. > > > 'Awareness only' isn't some samadhi trance-like state, but is > exactly like "no > > > bell, no 'I', just ringing". Things still happen, life carries on > but simply > > > that there is no I 'doing' anything (wu-wei... as opposed to > woo-woo!). > > > > > > Mike > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
