ED,

Aaagh! I posted part 2 first. This is part 1 and describes the jhanas 
beautifully. Please read and give me your impressions.

Mike


Religion & Beliefs
A Jewish Perspective on the JhanasBy Jay Michaelson / January 29, 2009
        * 

        * 

        * ShareThis1 
        * 
        * Comments (8)

The jhanas are  states of heightened concentration that have been cultivated by 
Hindus  and Buddhists for just under three thousand years. They are altered  
states, full of bliss and, I would say, holiness, and they play a  central role 
in the Buddha’s Eightfold Path ("right concentration").  Recently, I completed 
two months of silent meditation retreat devoted to  the jhana practice. I went 
with certain intentions and expectations,  which I’ll discuss in a moment, but 
the experience was more profound and  more religious than I expected. After a 
few introductory notes, I will  describe my experiences of the jhanic states 
and 
describe what I believe  to be their significance for Jewish theology and 
spirituality. As far  as I know, such a project has not been attempted before. 
1.         What I did, and why I did it I wish to make three introductory 
notes. 
First, I want to explain  why I undertook this rigorous practice, which 
involved 
sitting still for  extended periods of time (usually, 90 to 120 minutes), and 
spending the  entire day doing nothing but observing the sensations of the 
breath at  the nostrils, even while walking, eating, et cetera. I had three  
reasons, and discovered two additional ones during the retreat.      First, my 
real goal is liberation from the delusions of ego and the  clinging nature of 
the mind: to learn to let go of clinging. On the  Theravada Buddhist path, 
liberation comes from insight: directly seeing  and knowing that all phenomena 
are empty of substance, impermanent, and  fruitless to cling to. Insight, in 
turn, depends on concentration;  you’ve got to get really quiet to see these 
characteristics clearly. So I  went to learn concentration skills as a kind of 
prerequisite for a  four-month retreat that I am on now, as this article is 
published.      Second, I went because jhana itself helps insight. Distractions 
and  hindrances are suppressed in jhana, and the experience is deeply  
purifying 
and refreshing; one emerges with an extremely sharp, clear,  and quiet mind, 
ready to do the rigorous, moment-to-moment noticing that  leads to insight. 
Third  and finally, I did this practice because I was curious about jhana  
itself. On earlier retreats, I experienced what many meditators  experience 
when 
their minds become concentrated: deep contentment,  bless, gratitude, love, and 
awe at the beauty and miraculousness of  ordinary life. Jhanas are like those 
concentrated mindstates squared,  amplified, distilled — and I wanted to see 
what they were like.      Along the way, I discovered two additional purposes 
to 
the practice. One  is the deep "purification of mind" that is required to enter 
jhana: you  really have to see and let go of all of your stuff, which in my 
case  
included a lot of grief, confusion, loneliness, ego, expectation, and  just 
plain chatter. Every moment is an opportunity to let go of all this  stuff, and 
I had a number of extremely powerful openings that perhaps  I’ll write about 
some other day.     In addition, the jhanas were  themselves a powerful lesson 
in letting go. They are like everything I  had dreamed about from the moment I 
became interested in spirituality as  a young adult. Imagine your greatest 
dreams fulfilled, in oceans of  light, bliss, love, and mystical union. Now 
imagine that you have to let  them go. This is the lesson: that even the 
greatest of states arise and  pass. You can’t hold onto anything conditioned, 
even the dearest and  most precious experiences imaginable. This insight alone 
was surely  worth the price of admission.    The type of practice-what I did    
My  second prefatory note concerns the type of practice I did. There are  
different schools of thought among Buddhist teachers as to what  constitutes a 
jhana and how to cultivate it. Some hold that discursive  thought and 
perception 
of the outside world must completely stop for a  jhana to be truly taking 
place. 
In this model, a jhana is a totally  absorbed state of mind; the meditator is 
only aware of the object of  meditation (more on that in a moment), and nothing 
else. Even the  passage of time is not noticed in such an absorbed state. Other 
 
teachers, however, will say that a jhana has commenced as soon as its  factors 
are in place and an obviously altered state of mind has arisen.     My own 
practice was a hybrid of these two approaches. I studied with  perhaps the 
Buddhist world’s leading expert on jhana practice, who holds  the more strict 
view. Yet after a full month of rigorous concentration,  I was unable to 
achieve 
total absorption as his practice demanded. I  would enter clearly altered 
states, but would still be aware of strong  bodily sensations and the sense of 
time. Therefore, after one month, I  switched to the more moderate approach, 
which I had learned earlier. I  still cultivated the jhana in the "strict" 
method: I concentrated on the  sensation of breath at the nostrils until the 
mind formed a mental  image of the breath — a white cloudy light called a 
nimitta. The  nimitta would then become my exclusive focus of concentration. 
But 
I  proceeded through the first four jhanas even though the absorption was  not 
total. My experiences, as profound and powerful as they are, should  thus be 
understood as only partial in nature. I am a beginner — some  might say a 
failure — not a teacher and not an expert in these  practices.    (For detailed 
description of jhanic states and practice,  please read Shaila Catherine’s 
Focused and Fearless, the best contemporary book on the jhanas. The best online 
resource is my teacher Leigh Brasington‘s  website, where you can learn more 
about the stricter approach.)     Jhanas are better    That said, my third and 
final prefatory note is  that I actually do have a fair amount of experience 
with mystical  states, and these blow all those experiences out of the water. 
With the  possible exception of ayahuasca, I have never encountered anything 
like  this — and I have spent many years meditating, davening, doing energy  
work, and engaging in a wonderfully wide range of ecstatic and  contemplative 
practices. Without being too arrogant about it (which  would be an ironic 
reversal of the point of spiritual practice!), I  think I know whereof I speak.
When  I described some of my experiences to a friend, she remarked that they  
sounded similar to what Elizabeth Gilbert describes in her book Eat, Pray, 
Love.  
I had precisely the experiences Gilbert describes on my first  meditation 
retreats, six years ago. They are world-shattering,  mind-altering, and 
profound. They provide a direct experience of what  generations of mystics have 
described in glowing mystical terms. I do  not wish to minimize them, and have 
described them in these pages in the  past ("You Are God in Drag," "What the 
World Is").  But the jhanas were far, far more powerful and more profound — 
perhaps  an order of magnitude more. They’re like the qualities of those 
earlier  
experiences, well, concentrated, refined, and distilled. If what  Gilbert, and 
I 
in those earlier essays, described is like a lovely  Hershey’s Kiss, the jhanas 
are like a rich, hot molten chocolate cake.  Get it? 2.            Mikvas of 
light  With those  provisos out of the way, I will now describe my experiences 
of each of  the four basic jhanas. (There are actually eight jhanas, but the 
other  four are less essential to insight practice. Moreover, while I had some  
limited experiences with them, they require their own essay.) While the  
descriptions that follow may seem hyperbolic and overblown, I assure you  that 
I 
am deliberately understating and underdescribing the  experiences. Every writer 
who describes the jhanas does this. I don’t  want to condition your experience 
by telling you too much, and I don’t  want to heighten your expectations should 
you undertake jhana practice  yourself (which I hope you will).     First Jhana 
   
The first jhana is  like the "big wow," an awesome peak experience that arises 
after the  mind has finally settled on the object of concentration with 
focused,  
sustained, one-pointed attention. Bodily or emotional rapture called piti may  
arise, suffusing the body with bliss or filling the mind with  awe–sometimes 
the 
feeling is more "gross" and embodied, other times more  subtle and purely 
mental. In my experience, the nimitta would become  radiant, awesome, and 
beautiful, and grow to fill my entire field of  vision, and surround my body; 
the experience was like a glowing,  energetic light surrounding and cocooning 
my 
whole being. It’s quite  captivating. There is also a sense of seclusion–of 
finally being safe  from the chattering mind. From my Jewish spiritual 
perspective, this was  like holiness as the big amazing awesomeness, full of 
mysterium tremendum and radical amazement. It’s Niagara Falls, the Grand 
Canyon. 
Like many  mystics, I’ll use erotic analogies as well; the first jhana is like  
having sex, before orgasm: panting, arousing, ah–ahh—ahh— that sort of  thing.  
   
Eventually, though, the first jhana begins to feel like too  much effort. You 
have to work to keep it up. This is its advantage–if  you didn’t work, you 
wouldn’t get in–but eventually, after anywhere from  fifteen minutes to an hour 
or more (my longest was one hour), the mind  gets tired of ecstasy, excitement, 
and bliss and moves naturally onto  the second jhana. The transition between 
jhanas is always from gross to  subtle: the more gross factors drop off, 
revealing the more subtle ones  underneath. In the case of first-to-second, the 
factors of applied and  sustained thought drop, and the other factors–rapture, 
joy, and  one-pointedness of mind–reveal themselves more. Usually this "drop" 
is  
conscious; after a few weeks of practice, I would feel a kind of mental  
itchiness when it was time to move on, and would consciously resolve to  let 
the 
factors drop and the others predominate. A few times, though,  the drop 
happened 
automatically; the mind would just bail out.  Eventually, the four jhanas are 
kind of like four rooms in a house that  you’ve come to know; you don’t even 
have to make the resolve clearly,  because you know the territory, and can 
recognize it and adjust quite  naturally.    Second Jhana
In  the second jhana, the feeling tone shifts to joy–"drenched in delight"  in 
Shaila Catherine’s words. Effort drops away, and the mind rests  one-pointed on 
its focus. I experienced the second jhana as being like  swimming in a mikva of 
light–in my journal one time, I wrote that when  the nimitta expands, it is a 
"waterfall of shimmering light that fills  your body with joy." Again, 
sometimes 
this was a semi-bodily sensation,  other times purely mental. There was often a 
bright light in my eyes as  well–more on that below–and sometimes a deep sense 
of healing. This is  it, you’re here, you can trust and let go. The sexual 
analogy here is to  the time of orgasm itself–not the first moment, but the 
longer period  of time if, like me, you like really long and drawn-out orgasmic 
states.  It’s like that gorgeous sexual feeling of letting go: not ah-ah-ah, 
but  
ahhhhhh. Sometimes it really felt as if the light were kissing me,  penetrating 
me, filling me. This is God as lover; the fascinans,  the erotic partner 
envisioned and embodied by mystics. It’s really  something.    Believe it or 
not, the mind eventually finds all this  ecstasy, even without effort, a little 
gross. Piti becomes too showy;  it’s almost exhausting. Now, when I was first 
learning the jhanas, I  would spend several days with each one before moving 
on. 
Part of this  was to really nail down the jhana; the Buddha said that someone 
who  moves on too fast is like a foolish cow wandering from pasture to  
pasture. 
But another part was that it took me a while to get  disenchanted with these 
states. For several days, I couldn’t imagine  anything more wonderful than the 
second jhana. But eventually,  disenchantment sets in–once again, an insight 
that is, itself, worth the  price of admission. Eventually, the mind gets 
disenchanted with  anything. So the grosser factor of rapture drops away, 
leaving behind  only joy and one-pointedness.Third Jhana    If the second  
jhana 
is like an orgasm with God, the third jhana is like resting  comfortably on the 
breast of the Goddess; its dominant sensation is  contentment. Here, the love 
is 
less erotic and more familial; it’s like  being cradled by your mother–that 
kind 
of "ahh." The light I experienced  was golden, radiant, and warm. Many times, I 
cried and felt healed.  Other times, I was still and concentrated. And 
sometimes, I felt like a  little boy sitting by the window, with sunshine 
streaming in. In the  third jhana, piti is relinquished, and sukha, joy, 
becomes  
predominant. Sukha is quieter and more subtle than piti, it’s less  embodied, 
and more like an emotional, intellectual joy with a honey-like  embodied 
component. Meditators know sukha from whenever the mind in  concentrated and 
everything just feels lovely. The mind is content. What  could ever be wrong 
with the world? Of course, sukha is so lovely that  we naturally cling to it, 
which means we suffer when it’s gone — that’s  what’s wrong. But for me, I 
spent 
about three years cultivating sukha,  thinking it was enlightenment, and being 
devastated when, a few days  after retreat, it seemed to disappear.    Fourth 
Jhana    Finally, there  is the fourth jhana–the real point of it all, it 
sometimes seems. In  the fourth jhana, even joy passes away. The experience is 
totally  neutral: just "Ah," as in "Ah, I see." And yet, it somehow–just is.  I 
can’t quite describe it; there’s a powerful sense of equanimity, a  closeness 
to 
the object, and not much else. Somehow, this state is the  most beautiful at 
all, even though it is totally colorless, bliss-less.  The erotic flavor is not 
even post-orgasmic; it’s post-post. The mind is  clear, the restlessness is 
gone. It doesn’t feel good anymore, but in  some deep profound way, it feels 
extremely good and peaceful that it’s  not even necessary to feel good. This is 
not the Shechinah, not awe, not  love; it’s just YHVH–Is. It’s a love beyond 
love; satisfaction  without joy or even contentment.     For me, the fourth 
jhana is really  the point, because it leads to one of the deep insights of the 
jhanas:  that God is not in the fire, or the earthquake, or the flood. There’s 
a  
tendency that all of us have–but particularly spiritual Jews have–to  deify and 
thus idol-ize certain states. Oh, that gorgeous warmth of  lighting candles. 
Oh, 
we were so high during that drum circle / Kabbalat  Shabbat / whatever, that 
was 
reall,y mamash, it. But that’s not it. It is what’s always here; Ein Sof, 
everything. If it wasn’t always here, it isn’t it. Even the fourth jhana isn’t 
it–it’s  a state, with equanimity and focus that are conditioned, and thus pass 
 
away after a time. You can’t cling to it either.    Realdevekut has only one 
attachment: Is. Totally colorless, totally omnipresent, and  in fact, if you 
look closely, the only thing that doesn’t come and go.  Ramana Maharshi said, 
"Let come what comes, let go what goes. See what  remains." That is the essence 
of enlightenment right there, I’m telling  you. The way leads nowhere. There is 
no state that is it. This is  it; just this. Not feeling special about this, 
not 
feeling relaxed or  wise or anything in particular–although sometimes those 
feelings may  arise in the wake of letting go. Just is.     Now, does that mean 
 
that mystical states — including the jhanas themselves — are without  value? 
No; 
not at all. By fulfilling this spiritual seeker’s wildest  dreams of joy and 
rapture, the jhanas point to the limitations of  states, chiefly their 
transient 
nature. And next month, I’ll describe in  some detail the benefits as well as 
the limitations of spiritual states  of all kinds, mundane to marvelous. First, 
though, I want to focus on a  different question: God. Essay will continue. 

All images by Harriete Estel Berman. 

Reply via email to