Bill, I never said it is a bad (or good) thing. I don't think Mike did either ;-)
Siska -----Original Message----- From: "Bill!" <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 04:22:41 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle ...and what's so bad about living as a fox for 500 years? ...Bill! --- In [email protected], siska_cen@... wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Ah, got your point. > > > there is no self, yet.. > There is no self, no yet ;-) > > Siska > -----Original Message----- > From: mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:28:05 > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle > > Hi Siska, >  > Oh, I see. I thought you were asking if saying, "There is and isn't a > diifference" condemns you to 500 years as a fox. Really, it's just a question > of neither being absolute nor subjective. For example, there is no self, > yet... >  > Mike > > From: "siska_cen@..." <siska_cen@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, 6 September 2011, 11:28 > Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle > > >  > Hi Mike, > > Don't really get it, if what were true? > > Siska > From: mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:17:07 +0100 (BST) > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle >  > Hi Siska, >  > If that were true, then what wouldn't condemn you to 500 years as a fox? >  > Mike > > From: "siska_cen@..." <siska_cen@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, 5 September 2011, 18:48 > Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle > > >  > Hi Mike, > > > In other words, there is and there isn't a difference. > > I like this. > > Would statements implying there is or isn't a difference condemn you to 500 > years as a fox too? :-) > > Siska > From: mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:17:44 +0100 (BST) > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle >  > > > >In truth, Two and One are in support of one another. > > >>Here it seems that Rev Harvey makes distinction between Two and One. Are > >>they really different at all? > > Siska, > > Just as Bill! is condemed to live 500 years as a fox for saying that an > enlightened person isn't subject to karma (just as he would be if he > said that an enlightened person is subject to karma), so with this > question. There is no yes or no. In other words, there is and there isn't a > difference. > > Mike  >
