I agree with Edgar in  the sense that zen action as seen by and described by a 
third party would probably be 'moral'; BUT zen action as done from Buddha 
Nature is not done BECAUSE the action is moral - it's just done.  Just THIS!  I 
call that 'amoral' since it is not in the scope of the dualistic concept of 
moral/immoral.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Bill and Anthony,
> 
> I think Anthony's error is in thinking that morality comes from external 
> dictates that either are or are not complied with. That is after all the 
> usual definition.
> 
> However Zen action comes directly and spontaneously from within in direct 
> reaction to reality rather than in accord with some external dictate. It is 
> my contention that Zen realization which reveals that all beings have Buddha 
> nature and are real and sentient conscious beings automatically results in 
> what would be conventionally described as 'moral' behavior. This is because 
> one recognizes one shares the same Buddha nature stuff with all other beings, 
> and in fact with the whole of reality itself. There is nothing else. With 
> this realization one naturally acts in what would be described as a moral way 
> but this morality comes from within as natural spontaneous Zen rather than 
> from external dogma.
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
>  
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > Anthony,
> > 
> > You keep coming back to this - morality. It obviously bothers you so I will 
> > try to respond as fully as possible.
> > 
> > First of all we need to agree on a definition of 'morality':
> > 1. The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.
> > 2. A system of ideas of right and wrong conduct.
> > 3. Virtuous conduct.
> > (Source: www.thefreedictionary.com)
> > 
> > If this defintion is not satisfactory to you please suggest another. In the 
> > interium I'll assume this definiton is okay.
> > 
> > So 'morality' is tightely coupled to the dualistic concept of right/wrong. 
> > Further more it assumes there is a 'standard' or perhaps even an 'absolute' 
> > against which actions can be judged to determine if they are moral or 
> > immoral.
> > 
> > Buddha Nature doesn't work this way. It harbors no dualistic concepts. It 
> > adheres to no standards. It is Just THIS! That means the circumstances and 
> > your actions (or inaction) are all one. There is no separation, no dividing 
> > them up into categories like: me, child, pain, comfort, assist - or me, 
> > other, water, danger, rescue. It is all Just THIS!
> > 
> > Now I'm not sure exactly what your question is asking.
> > - If you're asking 'can zen be intentionally practiced immorally?', then my 
> > answer is 'no'.
> > - If you're asking 'can zen be intentionally practiced morally?', then my 
> > answer is 'no'.
> > - If you're asking 'can zen practice be judged by someone else as moral or 
> > immoral?', then my answer is 'yes'.
> > 
> > And although you didn't ask, if you did ask 'can zen be practiced 
> > intentionally?', my answer is 'no'.
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > > Â 
> > > It is due to a lack of challenges. The following two stories from China 
> > > serve the purpose:
> > > Â 
> > > A Tale of 18 Passers By
> > > A toddler was run over by a van in a small lane of the fast growing town 
> > > of Foshan. She was left lying on the street for an hour, during which 
> > > time 18 pedestrians and cyclists passed by. Some of them looked at the 
> > > scene and quickly turned the attention to another direction. The others 
> > > just went by without seemingly noticing anything, until an old woman 
> > > trash collector arrived and helped the kid to a hospital. The child later 
> > > died owing to wounds and losing too much blood.
> > > Â 
> > > A Foreign Tourist Saves a Local Woman
> > > In a scenic West Lake in Hangzhou, a woman fell into the water and was 
> > > struggling. Some people were seen on the shore, but what they did was 
> > > either taking pictures or just standing by. None of them even called 
> > > emergency or police. A kindhearted lady across the hemisphere from 
> > > Uruguay noticed what happened and quickly jumped into water to save the 
> > > woman.
> > > Â 
> > > The absence of morality is apparent in both cases. Can zen be practiced 
> > > in the same way?
> > > Â 
> > > Anthony
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 17 November 2011 10:20 AM
> > > Subject: [Zen] What's Up?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Â  
> > > I haven't seen any posts for several days now. What's everybody doing? 
> > > Zazen? Occupy @MyCity? Golf?
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to