Greetings to Bill and all
 
I can't help but be reminded here of the teaching that says that we are not Zen 
people, but Buddhists. Not even Zen Buddhists. Just Buddhists. I personally 
accept this. However, there is also the teachings that calls for categories. I 
personally find the Soto way much more favourable over Rinzai, even though the 
Soto way has far too many formalities for my liking(eg. bowing rules, 
name-giving, 'tea ceremony' of sorts, etc). Nevertheless, I may describe myself 
as Soto for the sake of convenience. I've also found it convenient by referring 
to myself as Mahayana in the presence of Theravada devotees. But, we're just 
Buddhists. Although there's no real need for any sort of description, Buddhists 
have to go through this for the sake of politics. We don't like the politics, 
but it's there. The usual reaction to my announcement of being Mahayana or Zen 
to our local Theravada community here DownUnder(Australia)is,"...Oh...I 
see..."....plus the surprised look
 on the face
 
in Buddha's grace
Mel


________________________________
From: Bill! <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, 13 January 2012 8:54 PM
Subject: [Zen] Re: Reading and Resources


  
Amy,

You're on the right track (IMO) if you have an innate dislike of labeling 
yourself as any one thing. The problem with labels is they are, like everything 
that's a product of our (human's) intellect, dualistic. So, if you label 
yourself as one thing then you are autmatically excluding other things
 
-----------------snip----------------

Reply via email to