Rewisk, If you have no use for non sense then you have no use for zen...Bill!
--- In [email protected], "rewrisk" <rewrisk@...> wrote: > > Your argument is based on a premise. > You confess that you do not know that premise to be true. > Therefore your words make a non sense. > I have no use for non sense. > > --- In [email protected], ChrisAustinLane <chris@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Chris Austin-Lane > > Sent from a cell phone > > > > On Jan 25, 2012, at 21:50, "rewrisk" <rewrisk@> wrote: > > > > > I answer this out of courtesy. > > > > It seems I have offended you. I apologize. My point is that there is no > > dividing line between you and these others, these philosophers, that you > > contrast to. All words are empty, mine, yours, Socrates, etc. > > > > These questions I am asking are where your language seems to buy into the > > belief that reality is separated into different kinds of > > words/people/things. > > > > That is my accusation, but I don't really find it is a matter for guilt, as > > this belief in separate kinds of things is something I myself fail to see > > through as well. It is a belief present in all of us. > > > > Sorry again for the offense. I won't use the short questions communication > > style with you again. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > Except for parts of a few scriptures, where have I spoken the words of > > > another? Used ideas pronounced by another? I have answered this question > > > from yourself before, this becomes an accusation. > > > An accusation that I know is born of ignorance as I know I speak from my > > > own experience and not using the words of another. > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], ChrisAustinLane <chris@> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Chris Austin-Lane > > >> Sent from a cell phone > > >> > > >> On Jan 25, 2012, at 17:56, "rewrisk" <rewrisk@> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Phillosophers speak to arouse a sense of things they understand and > > >>> perhaps hope to know. > > >> > > >> So there is some difference between you and these philosophers? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are > > > reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
