>My "I" is not a lie, but just a conventionalization, so we can talk together.
Good luck! ________________________________ From: Joe <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, 4 August 2012, 18:51 Subject: Re: [Zen] Samadhi Brother JMJM, You said it! They were for your noticing. You hit right upon it. I put those I-beams out there baldly for all to see. I have nothing to hide, neither about my point of view, nor about the small illusory being making the utterance. I quit that kind of hiding long ago. If you see the fallacy in my "I", it is just right. My "I" is not a lie, but just a conventionalization, so we can talk together. There, now; I've said "we", too. I am a complete dualist in this moment. Except for what is my foundation: the I-beams are in the air, true; and the foundation is strong in the footing of this great edifice of Nature. This guy is all over the place. Yet not really in any place. Better please let me "have" that Kyosaku now before I start making profound sense. On the shoulders, please, and a few flat stokes on each side of the spine. Ahh-h. Bless "you". Most compassionate. Practice well, with gratitude. Namo, --Joe 覺妙精明 （JMJM） <chan.jmjm@...> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > Notice the "I" in "I concur", the "I" in "I second". The "I" in "I > believe". > > We are all products of the causations. The "I" is just a result driven > by ALL. > > ALL is. > _/\_ > JMJM
