Brother JMJM,

You said it!

They were for your noticing.

You hit right upon it.

I put those I-beams out there baldly for all to see.

I have nothing to hide, neither about my point of view, nor about the small 
illusory being making the utterance.  I quit that kind of hiding long ago.  If 
you see the fallacy in my "I", it is just right.

My "I" is not a lie, but just a conventionalization, so we can talk together.

There, now; I've said "we", too.  I am a complete dualist in this moment.  
Except for what is my foundation: the I-beams are in the air, true; and the 
foundation is strong in the footing of this great edifice of Nature.  

This guy is all over the place.  Yet not really in any place.

Better please let me "have" that Kyosaku now before I start making profound 
sense.  On the shoulders, please, and a few flat stokes on each side of the 
spine.  Ahh-h.  Bless "you".  Most compassionate.

Practice well, with gratitude.

Namo,

--Joe

覺妙精明 (JMJM) <chan.jmjm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
> 
> Notice the "I" in "I concur", the "I" in "I second".  The "I" in "I 
> believe".
> 
> We are all products of the causations.  The "I" is just a result driven 
> by ALL.
> 
> ALL is.
> _/\_
> JMJM




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to