Mike, IMO you have to separate Jesus' teachings from the rest of the Bible - especially the Old Testament and most especially Leviticus. I don't think you'll find anything objectionable in the teachings attributed directly to Jesus. In fact Jesus is supposed to have said all the previous revealed teachings all boiled down to just one thing - Love One Another. That's not a bad summary, huh?
...Bill! --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote: > > Bill, > > I guess there are. My favourite is Mathew 6: 28. However, that's called > 'cherry-picking'. I could equally quote a number of verses from the Bible > that are morally repugnant (child sacrifice; genocide, slavery; rape etc etc > etc). > > Mike > > > > ________________________________ > From: William Rintala <brintala@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, 5 August 2012, 21:04 > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen > > >  > Mike: >  > "Then that doesn't make the Bible any truer, or better, than reflecting on a > book on Aesop's Fables (Aesop's Fables seems a damn sight better source for > morals than the Bible tho)." >  >    That I couldn't disagree with more. There are many biblical quotes > that have always resonated with a Zen like vibration for me. Such as this: >  > âBe careful not to do your âacts of righteousnessâ before men, to be > seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. > âSo when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the > hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I > tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you > give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is > doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what > is done in secret, will reward you. >  > âAnd when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray > standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I > tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you > pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is > unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. > And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they > will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your > Father knows what you need before you ask him. >  > ... if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will > also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will > not forgive your sins. >  > âWhen you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure > their faces to show men they are fasting. I tell you the truth, they have > received their reward in full. 17But when you fast, put oil on your head and > wash your face, so that it will not be obvious to men that you are fasting, > but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father, who sees what is > done in secret, will reward you. >  > âDo not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust > destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves > treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not destroy, and where thieves do > not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be > also. > âThe eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body > will be full of light. But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full > of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that > darkness! > âNo one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the > other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot > serve both God and Money. >  > âTherefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or > drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more important > than food, and the body more important than clothes? Look at the birds of the > air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly > Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Who of you by > worrying can add a single hour to his life? > âAnd why do you worry about clothes? See how the lilies of the field grow. > They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his > splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass > of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will > he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, > âWhat shall we eat?â or âWhat shall we drink?â or âWhat shall we > wear?â For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father > knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, > and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry > about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough > trouble of its own. >  >  >  Bill > > > > > Find what makes your heart singâ¦and do it! > > > > > ________________________________ > From: mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, August 3, 2012 8:45:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen > >  > Bill!, > > Then that doesn't make the Bible any truer, or better, than reflecting on a > book on Aesop's Fables (Aesop's Fables seems a damn sight better source for > morals than the Bible tho). > > Mike > > > ________________________________ > From: Bill! <BillSmart@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, 4 August 2012, 2:34 > Subject: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen > > >  > Mike, > > No, these kinds of intellectualizations don't make these stories 'true' and > more than a koan is 'true'. They can though be helpful as long as you don't > attach to them. Then they are the finger you become fixated on. > > ...Bill! > > --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@> wrote: > > > > Bill!, > > > > That's an interesting idea. It sounds like something Joesph Campbell would > > say. Maybe our splitting from God represents the beginning of dualism and > > the desire for the search back to the One again? Interesting. Just as I'm > > sure people were awakened to Buddha Nature before Guatama, so to many of > > the stories in the Bible predate the first writing of the first scrolls. > > The Flood springs to mind. Still doesn't make the stories true tho. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Saturday, 4 August 2012, 2:01 > > Subject: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen > > > > > > à> > Mike, > > > > I believe the story in the Bible of the 'Garden of Eden' is a mythologized > > description of what mankind's life was like before he became too dependent > > upon and attached to his rational mind (dualism - Knowledge of Good and > > Evil). Before that he lived at one with God - in the Garden of Eden. > > > > ...Bill! > > > > --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@> wrote: > > > > > > > Merle, > > > > > > It's a nice sentiment to try to do that, isn't it? I guess the problem is > > > is that we collect too much dust in our eyes as we acquire more of what > > > the world teaches us. I do have a vague memory/feeling tho,Ãâàof > > > playing in my parent's garden and it being what the Garden of Eden must > > > be like. I would've been less surprised to come across the Cheshire Cat > > > than I would if I'd come across the tabby next door. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@>To: "[email protected]" > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, 3 August > 2012, 8:56 > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen > > > > > > > > > Ãâà> > > > > > > > > Ãâàlook at life through the eyes of a young child... fresh, always > > > alert and forever curious..merle > > > > > > > > > Ãâà> > > Chris, > > > > > > >So I guess my question is that having now had a great deal more chance > > > to see from the non-dual perspective, do you find that the initial > > > experience you wrote about was really basically ordinary, but so far our > > > of your thinking that you were surprised at its nature? ÃâàOr do > > > you find it leaves you feeling there is some progression to your practice > > > and > > > liberation, and your ordinary experience before that seeing is not like > > > your ordinary experience now? < > > > > > > Thanks for reading and asking > questions. All I can say about it is that the objects we normally take for > granted were seen as they really are because the web of concepts we usually > overlay them with was removed. They just were. It struck me at the time > (during the episode) that seeing this way was the most natural and real way > of seeing, except not seeing with the eyes, and that it was all so obvious. > It was more like the objects were and I wasn't (Which is why Dogen's '10,000 > things' resonates). I have to say that my ordinary experience is not like it > was before, but neither is it like it was during the experience, which is why > I do feel there is some progression to my practice and liberation. It's not > for the purpose of recapturing a past experience (like a drug high), but to > get to the bottom of what it's all about. In a way, I've answered 'yes' to > both your questions, but contradictions seem okay now, too. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Chris Austin-Lane <chris@> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012, 4:15 > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen > > > > > > > > > Ãâà> > > This thread has been very interesting, but I have a question for Mike. > > > ÃâàI am honored that you shared your experience with us, and I hope > > > I can address a question without antagonizing you - it's a real question > > > I have, and I am perfectly willing to hear any honest answer. Ãâà> > > > > > As far as I can tell, every time one slows down the rush of thinking a > > > bit, out pops such a lovely universe as these dramatic experiences seem > > > to highlight. ÃâàBut, other than the strong emotions, I > don't read anything in these mystical experiences that isn't there each > moment, in the quiet still space that attending lets us notice. > ÃâàÃâàÃâàAfter each exhalation, perfect stillness, balanced > on the burning tip of creation. ÃâàSomething like that. Ãâà> > > > > > I've not had an enlightenment experience as a part of zen training*, but > > > they don't read as different from my frequent realizing I'm lost in day > > > dreams and returning to attentive zazen - tho that realization is rather > > > dull, it has the full sense of okness and the noticeable lack of distinct > > > boundaries. ÃâàWhen I stop crinkling up my mind, and attend to what > > > Bill! calls raw sensory input, living is awfully pretty and crystalline > > > and wonderful; even in the middle of an argument with my wife or kids, > > > here we are; how can I not smile a bit (unless it would upset the > > > companions)? ÃâàI have a fairly pleasant and > orderly life, to be sure, but even crashing on my bike is interesting. > ÃâàThat slight shift in perspective happens many times a day, but each > time I let go (of *my* thoughts, *my* preferences, *my* expectations), my ass > unclenches and I find that the moment is indeed complete and sufficient. > Ãâà> > > > > > So I guess my question is that having now had a great deal more chance to > > > see from the non-dual perspective, do you find that the initial > > > experience you wrote about was really basically ordinary, but so far our > > > of your thinking that you were surprised at its nature? ÃâàOr do > > > you find it leaves you feeling there is some progression to your practice > > > and liberation, and your ordinary experience before that seeing is not > > > like your ordinary experience now?Ãâà> > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > --Chris > > > chris@ > > > +1-301-270-6524 > > > > > > > *I had a couple of "it's ok, all is one" experiences as a child, and > > > occasionally as a parent (being a parent seems to for me to bring out all > > > sorts of states of love and wonder, due I guess to the physical > > > exhaustion, total dedication, and lack of personal wilfulness), that seem > > > sort of like what people describe, tho of course it had nothing to do > > > with zen training as I only started that a few years ago. Ãâà> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Joe <desert_woodworker@> wrote: > > > > > > Ed, > > > > > > > >Hugh bet that zen teachers use the word "samadhi'. ÃâàNot many talk > > > >about it. ÃâàExcept in dokusan. ÃâàIt's not a secret, but > > > >maybe since > > > >about half the folks on sesshin are pretty new, teachers do not make > > > >a big deal about it in public, while the old-timers of > course are > > > >just bathed in it, to their eyebrows. ÃâàOr we can hope, so. > > > > > > > >--Joe > > > > > > > > > > > >"ED" <seacrofter001@> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Mike, > > > >> > > > >> Samadhi has numerous meanings. ÃâàWhat do you mean by 'samadhi'? > > > >> ÃâàJoe, > > > >> what do you mean by 'samadhi' ? ÃâàÃâàDo Zen masters ever > > > >> use the term > > > >> 'samadhi'? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------ > > > > > > > >Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are > > > >reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
