On 10/10/2012 8:14 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
> How do you explain the non-locality then?
Consider an implication of the word 'non-locality' is there is no actual
place. No space. Since space and time are reciprocal functions, no
'space-time', at least not as anything other than a relativistic
observer dependent perceptual/conceptual framework.
If non-locality appears irrational, it simply reveals a limit of
rationality as a tool of understanding.
KG
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
