Merle, What's your definition of 'pollution'? ...Bill!
--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote: > > > >  go to beijing...the sky is grey with pollution..for christ sake...we are > all polluting the atmosphere...B were do you live are you in touch with > nature at all?...do you actually experience nature or just read about it > ?...merle >  > Thank you KG. My experience as an Exploration Geophysicist and studies in > Historical and Glacial Geology also confirm what you say. It is interesting > that during the last Ice Age global sea levels were 600 feet lower than they > are today.  From an Archeolgical and Anthropological standpoint this > suggests that evidence of human occupation will be found along these drowned > river valleys and the current Continental Shelf.  This is exciting to me > and there is some work currently being done in parts of the world.   >  B > > > > > Find what makes your heart singâ¦and do it! > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Kristopher Grey <kris@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sun, October 14, 2012 1:02:27 PM > Subject: Re: [Zen] greed has no boundaries an climate change is real..( human > made) > >  > With only 60+ credit hours in Atmospheric > Science/Meteorology/Oceanography/Space Weather/etc. - and having been a sea > ice analyst/forecaster for both polar regions at NAVPOLAROCEANCEN, doing > tropical weather at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center, and working as a > weather observer and forecaster on land and sea in both hemispheres for many > years - I tend to keep out of such discussions. > > Beyond noting the the other planets in our system show similar warming - we > are still thawing out from the last ice age - climate is not sensibly > observable on the scale of a human lifetime - and hasn't shown any > consistency over the span of human or even planetary existence - I will leave > people to their largely politically informed opinions and superstitions. > > The anthropomorphic crowd may get us to be a bit cleaner, which just being > responsible (though this threatens to come at ridiculous expense and > inefficiency due to government > having wet dreams over the opportunity to license & tax the air). The big > picture folks (what Merle likely has been programmed to call "deniers" - even > thought they don't deny warming trends at all - or even that we have a hand > in it - but only question the extent and reasonable response - if any - is > needed) may remind us were not "all that". > > "Keep a weather eye!" > > KG > > PS - Just 50 years ago there were people who stood 3x my height living all > over the World! > > > > On 10/14/2012 11:59 AM, William Rintala wrote: > >  > >Merle: > > > >I was going to let you get away with this but I am curious to examine the > >evidence that supports your position on global warming and human's as its > >cause. Please send it to me at at brintala@... or post it here if you > >wish. Or are you one of those people who say things like "please don't > >confuse the issue with facts, my mind is already made up"? I've watched > >Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" and nothing he said convinced me. Yes > >the atmosphere is warming and yes the glaciers are retreating but this has > >been happening for at least 12000 years. During the last Glacial period > >there was over a mile of ice covering the place where I was born in 1950. > >It's all gone now. Please respond with facts and not slander. Saying that > >I am wicked or that humans are the worst disaster that ever happened on > >earth offers me nothing to make a decision on. Just saying something > >doesn't make it so. > > B > > > > > > > > > >Find what makes your heart singâ¦and do it! > > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> > >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >Sent: Sun, October 14, 2012 3:05:01 AM > >Subject: Re: [Zen] greed has no boundaries an climate change is real..( > >human made) > > > > > >B... climate change is real and EVERYTHING TO DO WITH US...  you are wicked > >to say otherwise!..merle > > Merle: > > > >    You are beginning to sound like Schopenhauer who believed that the > >best thing that humanity could do is to stop breeding and allow the species > >to die out. Climate change is a matter of geologic fact, it is happening > >and has nothing to do with us. It's been warming up for over 12,000 > >years. Studies of ice cores from glaciers in Greenland and Antartica (the > >Vostok ice cores) gives us a record going back 800,000 years through > >several Glacial and interglacial periods. Analysis of gases trapped in the > >ice show a marked increase in greenhouse gasses during interglacial > >periods. This is consistent with the explosion of life during those times > >(Carbon Dioxide, Methane). The eruption of Krakatoa in 1883 was much more > >catastophic that anything humans have done the average global temperatures > >fell by as much as 1.2 °C (2.2 °F). Weather patterns continued to be > >chaotic for years, and temperatures did not return to normal until 1888. The > eruption injected an unusually large amount of sulfur dioxide (SO2) gas high > into the stratosphere which was subsequently transported by high-level winds > all over the planet. This led to a global increase in sulfurous acid (H2SO3) > concentration in high-level cirrus clouds. The resulting increase in cloud > reflectivity (or albedo) would reflect more incoming light from the sun than > usual, and cool the entire planet until the suspended sulfur fell to the > ground as acid precipitation. The Eruption of Santorini 3600 years ago did > even more damage. The eruption of Mount Pinatubo on June 15, 1991 produced > the second largest terrestrial eruption of the 20th century after the 1912 > eruption of Novarupta in the Alaska Peninsula. The effects of the Pinatubo > eruption were felt worldwide. It ejected roughly 10,000,000,000 tonnes > (1.1Ã1010 short tons) or 10 km3 (2.4 cu mi) of magma, and 20,000,000 t > (22,000,000 short tons)SO2 bringing vast quantities of > minerals and metals to the surface environment. It injected large amounts of > aerosol into the stratosphere â" more than any eruption since that of > Krakatoa. Over the following months, the aerosols formed a global layer of > sulfuric acid haze. Global temperatures dropped by about 0.5 °C (0.900 °F), > and ozone depletion temporarily increased substantially. Mount St Helen's in > 1980 was a relatively minor eruption and it sent up stuff that circled the > globe and its eruption was a blast that was 400 times more powerful than the > atomic bomb that leveled Hiroshima.  > > > >So what am I saying? The earth is very large compared to anything human. > > The forces that actually control things are on a scale of magnitude > >beyond anything that humanity can ever hope to control. We are merely one > >very small piece of this emmense planet. It will shrug us off like an > >elephant does a flea.  Near where you are in New Zealand you have Mount > >Taranaki which began erupting about 130,000 years ago, with large eruptions > >occurring on average every 500 years and smaller eruptions about 90 years > >apart. An explosive medium sized ash eruption occurred around 1755AD and > >minor volcanic events (creation of a lava dome in the crater and its > >collapse) occurred in the 1800âs. The last major eruption was around 1655 > >AD so we are due for another any time now and overdue for a small to medium > >sized one. The power of nature is terrible to behold. Remember the Tyrant > >Lizard, Tyranosaurus Rex? The Thunder Lizard, Brontosaurus? To quote > >Shelly and > his poem to the great Egyptian King Ramesses II > > > >Ozymandias > >                                 > >                                 > >                                 > >                           I met a > >traveller from an antique land > >                  >                                  >                                  >                                  >    Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone > >                                 > >         >                                  >                                  >                Stand in the desert. Near them, on the > sand, > >                                                                                                                                                               &am > p;am p;am p;nb sp;Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown, > >                                 > >                                 > >                                 > >                     And wrinkled lip, and sneer > >of cold > command, > >                                                                                                                                                               >  Tell that its sculptor well those passions > read > >                                                                                                                                                              > > Which yet > survive, stamped on these lifeless > things, > >                                                                                                                                                               T > he hand that mocked them and the heart that fed: > >                                 > >                                 > >                                 > >                        And on the pedestal > >these words appear: > >            >                                  >                                  >                                  >             "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: > >                                                                                                                                                               &a > mp;a mp;a mp;n bsp; Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!" > >                                 > >                                 > >                                 > >                        Nothing beside > >remains. Round the > decay > >                                                                                                                                                              >    Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare > >                                 > >                                 > >                                 > >                        The lone and level > >sands stretch far away > > > > > >My belief is that humans are not the scourge of the earth. All we have is > >this moment. All that we can work with is right here, right > >now.  Ringing our hands, calling names and condeming the species does > >nothing but increase the distance between us. It's gilding the lilly I > >suppose to further quote Gandhi in saying that you must be the change you > >want to see in the world. > > B > > > > > > > > > >Find what makes your heart singâ¦and do it! > > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> > >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >Sent: Sat, October 13, 2012 8:36:24 PM > >Subject: [Zen] greed has no boundaries > > > > > > > > > > b... we are destroying nature! > > get over it and accept. > >.humans are the worst disaster that ever happened to this earth..without > >humans it would be paradise!.. > >..where the hell do you live?.. > >. do you commune with nature..? > >..here where i live upon this mountain top i see the devastation..the > >climate change what it does to the garden" the garden of paradise". > >..yes and as you say humans are not significant in the scheme of things > >... but we are here now > >...so why destroy"? > >...we have the intelligence to make this a paradise on earth..why we do not > >is because of: GREED! > >  > > greed has no boundaries > > > > > > however some us walk amongst us who can see the light! > > and care > > merle > > > > > > > >I agree Bill!. I have always been confused by people who say that humans > >are destroying the environment or are acting in a way that harms nature. > >Unless we came from another planet we are a part of nature and nature is > >and has always been in a stae of flux. Human beings are not the beginning > >or the end of the process of natural evolution. If we create a world that > >is toxic to us we will become unfit (to use Darwin's meaning of the > >word). As a part of nature it is in our own best interest to create and > >nurture an environment that is conducive to our survival as a species. > >However, from a geologic perspective homo sapien isn't very significant not > >even worthy of a footnote. Joe, when is it postulated that our sun > >will become a Red Giant? How long before that will life on Earth become > >unsustainable, something like 5 thousand million years? > > > >B > > > > > > > > > >Find what makes your heart singâ¦and do it! > > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@...> > >To: [email protected] > >Sent: Sat, October 13, 2012 4:21:07 AM > >Subject: Re: [Zen] calm down > > > > > >Mike, > > > >I think you may have misread me, or I have misstated my position. > > > >My position is that EVERYTHING humans do is part of nature - is natural. > >This is as opposed to those who say that humans 'interfere with' nature or > >do 'unnatural' things. > > > >Oh! I just re-read your post and see what you're really pointing out is what > >you think is the inconsistency in the statements about 'nature' and then > >'reality'. > > > >I do not consider 'nature' as 'reality'. 'Nature' is itself a mental > >construct (illusion). > > > >I suspect that you want to, as does Edgar, to say that 'reality' includes > >EVERYTHING including illusions, but I say no. Reality is Reality, or > >Emptiness is Emptiness. Illusions are Illusions, or Form is Form. > > > >That's the way it looks from my side of cyberspace anyway. > > > >...Bill! > > > >--- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@> wrote: > >> > >> Bill!, > >> > >> > >> >but your statement implies that human intervention and management is NOT > >> >part of nature. > >> > >> Yet then you say: > >> > >> > >> >These mental constructs are NOT reality. > >> > >> In this big old universe of ours, what can stand apart/outside? > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Bill! <BillSmart@> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Saturday, 13 October 2012, 2:30 > >> Subject: Re: [Zen] calm down > >> > >> > >> à> >> Edgar, > >> > >> You're doing it AGAIN! > >> > >> You just stated: "...letting nature take care of itself with minimal human > >> intervention or 'management'. Now at least you said 'minimal', but your > >> statement implies that human intervention and management is NOT part of > >> nature. > >> > >> I'll give you an extreme, concrete example so there can be no wiggle room > >> for either of us: Humans create nuclear power and then dispose of > >> radioactive nuclear waste in a manner that changes the environment. > >> > >> Is this human activity natural (part of nature) or not? > >> > >> ...Bill! > >> > >> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote: > >> > > >> > Bill, > >> > > >> > No, you have my views exactly backward. I'm supporting the NON human > >> > view of the environment, the view of letting nature take care of itself > >> > with minimal human intervention or 'management'. > >> > > >> > Edgar > >> > > >> > > >> > On Oct 12, 2012, at 3:00 AM, Bill! wrote: > >> > > >> > > Edgar, > >> > > > >> > > Action is indeed not inconsistent with zen. > >> > > > >> > > What I and I believe KG are trying to point out is most everything > >> > > you've talked about concerning the environment is based on a > >> > > human-centric point of view. So when you throw around terms like > >> > > 'interfering' and telling us to 'grow up', my only response back to > >> > > you would be 'grow out' - expand your perspective...Bill! > >> > > > > >> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > KG, > >> > > > > >> > > > Your notion that nothing can be done to save the planet is dangerous > >> > > > and mistaken. There are many who are working diligently including > >> > > > myself. To what extent it succeeds remains to be seen. > >> > > > > >> > > > Zen is not equivalent to hopelessness, inaction and nihilism as you > >> > > > imply. That's a serious Western misconception. Action can be done > >> > > > with Zen quite effectively... Action is NOT inconsistent with Zen. > >> > > > > >> > > > Edgar > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Oct 10, 2012, at 10:59 PM, Kristopher Grey wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I never said a wit about OK/not OK. That's your judgement. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I simply find the very premise, as you lay it out, to be formed of > >> > > > > the same destructive impulse to control. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I might say planetary scale destruction is inevitable, as that > >> > > > > appears a logical albeit pointless conclusion, but I certainly > >> > > > > don't claim to know so. Nor do I have reason to be concerned in > >> > > > > the way you appear to be. Righteous indignation may feel good, but > >> > > > > it's not a prerequisite for action. It only acts to spins the > >> > > > > wheel. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > KG > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 10/10/2012 7:35 PM, Edgar Owen wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Merle, > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Yes, KG seems obsessively attached to this discussion and why > >> > > > >> destroying the planet is OK... > >> > > > >> :-) > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Edgar > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> On Oct 10, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Merle Lester wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> hey hey lads...settle down..calm please!...KG your loosing the > >> > > > >>> pulse..merle > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> Yes, yes. That you hold a great many things to be of high > >> > > > >>> importance is obvious to all but you. Thus you assume > others are are talking about such things, and assume they are ignorant of > same, when they are only talking about your ignorant attachments to these > forms of divisive thinking. > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> KG > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> On 10/10/2012 11:27 AM, Edgar Owen wrote: > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> KG, > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> I find it appalling you support the destruction of the planet > >> > > > >>>> by humans and attack those who argue against it... > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> The lowest of the low... > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Edgar > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Kristopher Grey wrote: > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Definitive dependency - in other words you frame this in a > >> > > > >>>>> self-supporting way. The way a child argues when trying to > >> > > > >>>>> sound all grown up. You might as well just say: > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> "You are a stupid baby! Stop being such a stupid baby!" *L* > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> No one is denying 'reality' but you Edgar. You are perverting > >> > > > >>>>> others words to fit your preconceptions. You frame things as > >> > > > >>>>> being out of control/needing to be controlled - which is the > >> > > > >>>>> very divisive attitude that causes all the shit you find so > >> > > > >>>>> wrong in the world. > >> > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Opposition distracts. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> KG > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> On 10/10/2012 6:47 AM, Edgar Owen wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> Bill, > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> By your perverted logic it is totally OK for man to be > >> > > > >>>>>> destroying the planet because that's just a natural process. > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> Grow up and get real. Zen is not clever sophisms, it's > >> > > > >>>>>> reality... > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> Edgar > >> > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Bill! wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Edgar, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> What's REALLY important is that it's been framed wrong. It's > >> > > > >>>>>>> been framed as humans vs. nature, or as you put it humans > >> > > > >>>>>>> 'interfering' in nature. As long as humans think they are > >> > > > >>>>>>> not part of nature and taht all their action are natural > >> > > > >>>>>>> there will be this problem. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> When a beaver builds a dam is that interfering with nature? > >> > > > >>>>>>> When a squirrel shits in the woods is that interfering with > nature? When a human splits an atom is that interfering with nature? When a > human manipulates DNA is that interfering with nature? > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> What is the quality that humans have that other animals > >> > > > >>>>>>> don't have that renders them capable of interference - IYO? > >> > > > >>>>>>> (I just made that up, IYO = 'in your opinion') > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> ...Bill! > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> > >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > Come on Bill. > >> > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > In human discourse about Man's impact on nature, that's > >> > > > >>>>>>> > the way it's defined, and the whole issue is framed, as > >> > > > >>>>>>> > you well know... > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > Edgar > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > On Oct 9, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Bill! wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > Edgar, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > This was a VERY SERIOUS response. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > Why is it that you think the things that humans do are > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > 'unnatural' or against nature but the things that other > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > life does is 'natural' and okay? A friend of mine very > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > wisely (IMO)once suggested that all ethics should be > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > applied to humans and other life forms equally. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > What is the quality that you believe separates humans > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > from the rest of nature so that human activities and > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > artifacts can be labeled as 'interference'? > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > ...Bill! > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > <edgarowen@> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > Joe, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > Come on, it's a serious issue... > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > Edgar > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Joe wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Edgar, > >> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > And Humans are just the tip of the iceberg, too. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > I don't know why plants and animals insist on > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > interfering with the way Nature works. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > For example, on the early earth there was a nice > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > atmosphere without oxygen. But blasted Cyanobacteria > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > evolved which like to sip the methane and other > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > gases there were back then, and started polluting > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > the atmosphere with ...Oxygen! > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Then -- wouldn't you know -- other > organisms formed which turned CO2 into even MORE Oxygen, with a help from > light from the Sun. The nerve! They got away with it, though, because there > were no Police. The rug was pulled out from under Nature yet again! > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Later, some animals evolved, which USE the oxygen. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Much later, some of these animals of the Mammal > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > variety called "Beavers" began to INSIST that they > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > interfere with the stately FLOW of river tributaries > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > and streams, by ...damming them up! Such nerve. You > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > may be sure that this caused inundations upstream, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > and occasional floods downstream when the dams > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > burst. Havoc. Bye, bye, Nature! > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > The nerve of these organisms: Micro-organisms, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Plants, and Animals. Always interfering with the way > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Nature works! > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > At least on the Moon there is no such interference, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > there's just a continual, thin, rain of meteorites > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > pummeling the surface, and no atmosphere to make > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > things rust. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Oops!, some exotic Mammals left some footprints on > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > the Moon, and some machinery, during the last fifty > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > years. WHY must there always be such interference? > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > The Moon had been Nature's nice, quiet, haven for > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > rock and dust for so long. Why must things always go > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > downhill? > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > --Joe > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > On 10/7/2012 9:26 PM, Edgar Owen wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > Why do humans always insist on interfering with > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > the way nature works? > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
