Mike,

FINALLY something real from you.  There may be hope after all...for both of us

hongyeongsoo

On 10/27/12, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I just can't believe someone would doubt the Pearls of Wisdom Emanating from
> my Fully Enlightened Being, so I have to reply that way. Hongyeongsoo is
> lucky I merely replied by email - it would be much worse for him if I had
> his real name and address...
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Chris Austin-Lane <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, 26 October 2012, 2:02
> Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
>
>
>
> The idea of a loop of "why do you imagine me thusly?"  "it is you that
> imagine, if you do not cease" captures my fancy.  no doubt one or the other
> would wake up and the pattern would fall aside, ceasing
> On Oct 25, 2012 5:25 PM, "mike brown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Lol! It wasn't just me that had a profound experience of deja vu then.
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Chris Austin-Lane <[email protected]>
>>To: [email protected]
>>Sent: Friday, 26 October 2012, 1:09
>>Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
>>
>>
>>
>>Please can you reply to a post from KG?  Pretty please?
>>--Chris Ausin-Lane
>>sent from a train
>>1-301-270-6524
>>On Oct 25, 2012 4:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > There's no need to speculate whether we are always aware, or not. We
>>> > just
>>> > are. Of course, some are not aware that we are always aware. Funny you
>>> > should put me in that camp, but there you are...
>>>
>>> yes, a need to or not does not interfere with your speculation.  ;-)
>>>
>>> "We just are"  Can you feel it in your zen bones?
>>>
>>> it makes no difference to me, but when you use expressions like "going
>>> beyond" there must be a lacking, a goal, call it what you like.
>>>
>>> hongyeongsoo
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Mike
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> >  From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> > To: [email protected]
>>> > Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2012, 23:53
>>> > Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>>does a door-post lack anything?
>>> >>
>>> >> Well, you've just answered your own question by asking me and not the
>>> >> door-post.
>>> >
>>> > i ask you because you seem to think so or not so.
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>more than enough awakened persons have stated, "Awakening chooses
>>> >> you"; not the other way around.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> That's only one side of the dualistic coin (tariki = outside help;
>>> >> other
>>> >> power). The other side is of the coin is Jiriki (Awakening brought
>>> >> about
>>> >> by
>>> >> one's own self power/effort). They're not mutually exclusive, btw.
>>> >
>>> > tariki/jiriki...huh?  outside of scriptures and/or japanese language.
>>> > show me please...
>>> > also, "outside(tariki)/inside(jiriki)"?  of what?  WHO?
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>> No conditions.
>>> >>
>>> >> You could say that Buddha Nature is the Unconditioned, but what
>>> >> prevents
>>> >> a
>>> >> person in a coma from becoming Awakened in this very moment?
>>> >
>>> > i don't know
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>>"beyond intellect into intuition and awareness"?  have you been
>>> >>> there?
>>> >>
>>> >> Who hasn't been there? Who isn't there now? Even when you're in the
>>> >> middle
>>> >> of a grievous argument your awareness of being doesn't disappear.
>>> >
>>> > reminds me of Zuigan's morning question, "Master, Master, are you
>>> > awake? are you Super Awake?"  okay, so no problems?  what are you
>>> > aspiring towards?
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>or are you just speculating?
>>> >>
>>> >> What do you think?
>>> >
>>> > yes.
>>> >
>>> > hongyeongsoo
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Mike
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >>  From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2012, 19:34
>>> >> Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> does a door-post lack anything?
>>> >>
>>> >> more than enough awakened persons have stated, "Awakening chooses
>>> >> you"; not the other way around.  No conditions.
>>> >>
>>> >> "beyond intellect into intuition and awareness"?  have you been
>>> >> there?
>>> >> or are you just speculating?
>>> >>
>>> >> hongyeongsoo
>>> >>
>>> >> "zazen is good for nothing"
>>> >>
>>> >> On 10/24/12, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> In Edgar's defence, try telling a door-post, or a one day old baby,
>>> >>> or a
>>> >>> person in a coma - "Just This" - and see if they Awaken. So the
>>> >>> intellect
>>> >>> is
>>> >>> needed to both live and set the conditions for awakening, but
>>> >>> toreally
>>> >>> live
>>> >>> we have to go beyond the intellect into intuition and awareness. 2
>>> >>> plus
>>> >>> 2
>>> >>> =
>>> >>> 4. But what does 4 equal?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Mike
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ________________________________
>>> >>>  From: Joe <[email protected]>
>>> >>> To: [email protected]
>>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2012, 23:26
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Group, & Edgar,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I did my level best to draw Edgar out, but to Noah Veil.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I inscribe my Gatha in sorrow, with regret and apology to all.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> To Edgar:
>>> >>> -- -----
>>> >>> Stubbornness does not Compassion show;
>>> >>> Nor Self-Protectiveness quicken the Slow.
>>> >>> One-up-man-ship
>>> >>> Did never steal THIS show.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Generosity and consideration
>>> >>> Are a far more wholesome ration.
>>> >>> But Clarity, Honesty, and help,
>>> >>> Come not from a whelp.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> To raise a point and then depart
>>> >>> Is the misplaced throwing of a dart.
>>> >>> To live to lie another day,
>>> >>> is the cellulose Philosophy of a bale of Hay.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --J. Guo-Xiang Tennen M.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> REALITY, THE WORLD OF FORMS, as I just said!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
>>> reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to