Bill, Yes, you got all those points correct!
Congratulations! Edgar On Feb 17, 2013, at 8:29 PM, Bill! wrote: > Edgar, > > The article is the article. So what? I want to know YOUR opinion on the > contents of the article, not just read the article. In your retort below you > did reveal a lot: > > You believe: > > - some newspapers are 'respected' and some are not > - some newspapers are 'major' and some are not > - the content of articles printed in newspapers that you consider both > 'respected' and 'major' are more legitimate than someone's opinion > - some on this forum don't want to hear anything bad about zen > - zen has something to do with censorship and truth > > Thanks for sharing...Bill! > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen wrote: > > > > It's news by a respected major newspaper about a major Zen figure, NOT > > someone's opinions. > > > > But of course we wouldn't want anything not Zen politically correct on the > > group now would we? > > > > Censorship or truth? Which is true Zen? > > > > Edgar > > > > > > > > On Feb 17, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Bill! wrote: > > > > > I second that wholeheartedly! > > > > > > I participate in this forum to hear YOUR views, not just be directed to > > > SOMEONE ELSE's views (who are not even members of this forum) unless that > > > are cited to support something you have said. > > > > > > ...Bill! > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Joe" wrote: > > > > > > > > (never yet looked at a link without commentary by the poster) > > > > > > > > --Joe > > > > > > > > > Edgar Owen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/world/asia/zen-buddhists-roiled-by-accusations-against-teacher.html?hp > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
