Mike,

I think you may have a bug in yours!
:-)

Edgar


On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:02 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> 
> Edgar,
> 
> Are these your imaginary stages like your imaginary computer program 
> analogies?
> 
> Mike
> 
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
> 
> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
> To: <[email protected]>; 
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Hello 
> Sent: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 2:28:03 PM 
> 
>  
> Bill,
> 
> 
> If you're a good boy I might tell you about stage 4!
> :-)
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Edgar,
>> 
>> Great! Now that I'm finished with Stage 3 can I move on to Stage 2?
>> 
>> ...Bill!
>> 
>> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Bill,
>> > 
>> > Absolutely! You as an empty form being hit by the empty form of a bus 
>> > generates the empty form of you dying. It's all empty, but emptiness is 
>> > real....
>> > 
>> > Edgar
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Bill! wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Edgar,
>> > > 
>> > > Is this part of Stage 3?
>> > > 
>> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Bill,
>> > > > 
>> > > > If you think you are NOT bound by cause and effect why can't you fly? 
>> > > > 
>> > > > Try stepping in front of a bus and see if you are bound by cause and 
>> > > > effect or not!
>> > > > 
>> > > > Jeeeez!
>> > > > 
>> > > > Edgar
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Bill! wrote:
>> > > > 
>> > > > > Mike,
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > The zen saying "When hungry we (sic) eat" does imply cause and 
>> > > > > effect. So does "When hungry we don't eat" and "When not hungry we 
>> > > > > eat". Implying doesn't make it so. The saying is just meant to 
>> > > > > describe impromptu, unconditioned action, not to illustrate 
>> > > > > cause-and-effect.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Also (and IMO) you're reading a little too much into the koan to 
>> > > > > jump to the conclusion that being cast into the body of a fox for 
>> > > > > 500 lifetimes is NEGATIVE karma or being released from that was 
>> > > > > POSITIVE karma. Also you've neglected to note that the 'effect' (500 
>> > > > > lifetimes as a fox) was dismissed as soon as the old man heard the 
>> > > > > turning words. These words broke the chain of cause-and-effect.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > I don't know who every came up with the term 'moral causation' but 
>> > > > > it is doubly problematic for me. One because the concept of 
>> > > > > causation (the chain of cause-and-effect relationships) is illusory, 
>> > > > > and two because 'morality' is just another one of those two-sided 
>> > > > > coins with 'moral' on one side and 'immoral' on the other. In other 
>> > > > > words is a dualistic concept which makes it illusory. Dogen didn't 
>> > > > > really use this term,did he?
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > You do attribute to Dogen the statement in relationship to HYAKUJO 
>> > > > > AND THE FOX that "cause-and-effect are immovable". That's obviously 
>> > > > > not so because the turning word removed them.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > For me (and this is Bill! speaking) a person is only subject to 
>> > > > > cause-and-effect if he fooled by them, and if he is fooled by them 
>> > > > > he is not enlightened.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > ...Bill! 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@ wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Bill!,<br/><br/>As you say, we do need to live in the world of 
>> > > > > > illusions and that is why we need to see things as "real" in terms 
>> > > > > > of the relative (I've never claimed anything as not being 
>> > > > > > illusory, just that to do so is not practical to live a human 
>> > > > > > life). For example, in Zen the saying is 'When hungry we eat' 
>> > > > > > (how's that for cause and effect!). It doesn't say 'When hungry - 
>> > > > > > just dismiss hunger as illusion'. <br/><br/>My reading of the last 
>> > > > > > part of the koan is just that karma is not fixed (determined) and 
>> > > > > > can be changed. Even the negative karma of living as a fox for 500 
>> > > > > > lifetimes was eventually extinguished (it could even be argued 
>> > > > > > that 500 lifetimes was necessary before the old man could become 
>> > > > > > enlightened, therefore making it positive karma if that is what 
>> > > > > > was required for his enlightenment). <br/><br/>I cut this from 
>> > > > > > angelfire.com:<br/><br/>"Causation" in this passage refers to 
>> > > > > > "moral causation." The Buddhist concept of Karma acknowledges that
>> > > > > > good/bad deeds, thoughts, and so forth result in good/bad effects. 
>> > > > > > Thus the import of the question posed by the "fox" is whether or 
>> > > > > > not the Enlightened person is subject to Karma. Hyakujo's answer, 
>> > > > > > in effect, affirms that the Enlightened person is subject to moral 
>> > > > > > causation. Katsuki Sekida offers a common Zen interpretation of 
>> > > > > > this passage in his comment: "Thus to ignore causation only 
>> > > > > > compounds one's malady. To recognize causation constitutes the 
>> > > > > > remedy for it." See Karma and Free Will.<br/><br/>Dogen Zenji's 
>> > > > > > employment of this story in the "Daishugyo" chapter of the 
>> > > > > > Shobogenzo implies that, on one level, he thinks Hyakujo's answer 
>> > > > > > indeed provides a "remedy" for the old man's predicament. Yet 
>> > > > > > Dogen was rarely content with merely citing traditional Zen 
>> > > > > > interpretations of passages; typically, he sought to push his 
>> > > > > > students to a further understanding by a creative reinterpretation 
>> > > > > > of a passage. Lest his disciple therefore think this
>> > > > > > not-ignoring/recognition of causation is de facto a release from 
>> > > > > > it in an ultimate sense, Dogen answers that the passage means 
>> > > > > > "cause and effect are immovable." In other words, moral causation, 
>> > > > > > for Dogen, is an inexorable fact of human existence."<br/><br/>For 
>> > > > > > me then (this is Mike speaking!), the enlightened person is still 
>> > > > > > subject to cause and effect, but is not fooled by it. 
>> > > > > > <br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > 
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > 
>> > >
>> >
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to