Mike, I agree with you IF you can indeed perceive 'sweet' without being attached. Most people can't and that's why I'm saying IMO it would be better not to use such dualistic, judgmental words when representing experience (Buddha Nature).
...Bill! --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@... wrote: > > Bill!,<br/> <br/>This I mostly disagree with. Escaping from life's suffering > isn't (only) the 'being in the moment' of biting the apple, but also the > non-attachment to perceptions. Enjoyment isn't a crime or something that > precludes the cessation of suffering. The attachment to it > is.<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
