Mike, I've never heard that before, but could kind of see what it means. However at some point I do start discounting Buddhist doctrine and dogma. I've told you that before. I think Buddhist teachings are useful up to a point, as a general metaphor which tries to explain all these things, but if taken 'as gospel' (pardon the pun) they are just more attachments that you're eventually going to have to deal with.
...Bill@ --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@... wrote: > > Bill!,<br/><br/>All dualities, contradictions and paradoxes are reconciled in > buddhahood, so I don't see a problem. Doesn't Mahayana say that Samsara is no > different to Nirvana?<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for > iPad > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
