edgar..yes indeed why not?.. via hologram?..merle


  
Merle,

It could be fun with you. Want to try?
:-)

Edgar




On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Merle Lester wrote:

  
>
>
>
>
> ass yoga..interesting..is it fun?..merle
>
>
>  
>Edgar,
>
>Does it need pointing out to you that I said in an earlier post that having 
>one unique attribute DOES NOT MAKE US SUPERIOR TO OTHER ANIMALS. Pointing out 
>that attribute is *not* trashing" other animals. It's like saying I'm trashing 
>bats because they don't have the same vision as us (yes, a bat's 'vision' is 
>more acute than ours, yawn). And when you understand the first thing about Zen 
>you can lecture me. In the meantime I'd just practice your ass-yoga.
>
>Mike
>
>
>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad 
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From:  Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
>To:  <[email protected]>; 
>Subject:  Re: [Zen] rise above to where? 
>Sent:  Tue, Jun 25, 2013 11:22:13 AM 
>
>
>  
>Mike and Joe (and Merle fyi),
>
>
>It is typically the most insecure of men that trash animals in a vain attempt 
>to prove their superiority over them.
>
>
>Feeling incomplete and insecure in themselves they seek illusory completeness 
>by trashing other beings so they can feel superior by comparison.
>
>
>This is NOT Zen. If you realize Zen mind you ARE complete in yourself and have 
>no need of trashing any other being human or animal!
>
>
>Edgar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>  
>>Merle,
>>
>>No confusion here whatsoever. Human's have the ability/potential to act with 
>>compassion in every action (***regardless*** of examples where they don't). 
>>Animals don't have, or don't demonstrate this, anywhere near human's 
>>capabilities. A dog waiting for his master to come home. Or a kitten suckling 
>>from a pig isn't the same thing. Man has had religious beliefs and practiced 
>>religious rituals for millennia. Where's the same evidence for any other 
>>species spiritual practices?
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad 
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From:  Merle Lester <[email protected]>; 
>>To:  [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
>>Subject:  Re: [Zen] rise above to where? 
>>Sent:  Tue, Jun 25, 2013 7:37:20 AM 
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> mike..it's not dumbing down we need but greater clarification...your 
>>confused state of mind is at fault here..merle
>>  
>>Edgar,
>>
>>I don't know how I could dumb it down any further for you and Merle.
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad 
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From:  Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
>>To:  <[email protected]>; 
>>Subject:  Re: [Zen] rise above to where? 
>>Sent:  Tue, Jun 25, 2013 2:11:05 AM 
>>
>>
>>  
>>Mike,
>>
>>
>>If that's so you are having a lot of difficulty expressing your point which 
>>seems quite the opposite...
>>
>>
>>Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Jun 24, 2013, at 8:42 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>  
>>>Edgar, Merle,
>>>
>>>You two should really knock your heads together! Edgar, you've just cited a 
>>>story proving my point and Merle chimes in with"Beautiful!". Like the Abbott 
>>>and Costello of the Zen forum..
>>>
>>>Mike 
>>>
>>>
>>>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From:  Merle Lester <[email protected]>; 
>>>To:  [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
>>>Subject:  Re: [Zen] rise above to where? 
>>>Sent:  Tue, Jun 25, 2013 12:27:03 AM 
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> beautiful edgar.... beautiful...!!!!!!!!... the point that joe cannot get 
>>>his head around is...tiger eat lunch...murderers kill for killing's 
>>>sake..though some have known to make it their lunch as well... being a 
>>>burger for a tiger is a good plan...merle
>>>  
>>>Joe,
>>>
>>>
>>>Apparently you're ignorant of the story of the Buddhist monk who gave his 
>>>body to the hungry mother tiger to feed her starving cubs?
>>>
>>>
>>>Edgar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Jun 24, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Joe wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>>Merle,
>>>>
>>>>Once you're dead, it's only the aftermath of the death that could possibly 
>>>>matter.
>>>>
>>>>If a Tiger eats you, no one gets to use your organs.  Your organs could 
>>>>save and improve the lives of 5 or 6 people.  Tiger only gets one meal out 
>>>>of you.  Two days later, she'll need another meal.  That's not great use of 
>>>>Human tissue.  But organ donation has that beat by miles.
>>>>
>>>>See you're just now speaking about "the fact", the fact in your present 
>>>>case.  But that's too miniscule a conversation, and should not concern us 
>>>>here.  Speaking in general, it's better to be shot dead than to be eaten by 
>>>>a Tiger.
>>>>
>>>>I know you agree, now that you've refreshed your view of what we're 
>>>>actually talking about.
>>>>
>>>>No one wants the cataract-y corneas of most of us "Seniors".  Except Tigers.
>>>>
>>>>Stay clear of Tigers, and gun-totin' killers, just the same.  Long life!
>>>>
>>>>--Joe
>>>>
>>>>> Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> that's not the point joe...
>>>>> a tiger is doing what a tiger does..having lunch..
>>>>> a murderer is going against the grain of.."thou shalt not kill"...what's 
>>>>> organ donation got to do with this?... 
>>>>> if your over 70 no one wants your worn out organs here in australia.. 
>>>>> only the corneas...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>>
> 
>
>
>
>

 

Reply via email to