Joe,

Private or public either one fine with me...

Edgar


On Jun 26, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Joe wrote:

> Bill!, Edgar, Group,
> 
> Thanks for airing the draft around and considering comments.
> 
> The draft policy looks good to me. I will follow it or any other finalized 
> one if implemented.
> 
> I look on such a policy and its respect and enforcement as having the utmost 
> value.
> 
> On a point of operation, I think a private warning from the moderator(s) on 
> infractions is better than a public one because a private warning will not 
> stimulate or instigate online discussion of the infraction. I think it's 
> enough for the errant poster alone to be informed of having crossed a line or 
> violated Terms of Service; it's in any case up to the errant poster to either 
> reform, or to be moderated (or perhaps even sensibly to be banned in an 
> extreme set of recurring instances).
> 
> I look forward to concentrated discussions, more dedicated upon our topic(s).
> 
> With thanks! for all you do, each and every one,
> 
> --Joe
> 
> > "Bill!" <BillSmart@...> wrote:
> >
> > Nighty-night all...I'll pick up any comments in the morning and we can get 
> > this finalized and in place.
> > 
> > Thanks...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the policy Edgar, Al and I have come up with regarding future 
> > > Posts and Replies. Please review it and return comments preferably 
> > > publicly or privately if you must to Edgar or me.
> > > 
> > > ***************************
> [snip]
> 
> 

Reply via email to