MIke and Bill, This is funny because even the word 'snitch' was used incorrectly. A snitch is someone who reveals something secret about somebody. It has nothing whatsoever to do with a public comment on a public post.
Edgar On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:54 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Bill!, > > Point taken. From this post onwards I won't be calling anyone an > 'unconscionable snitch' - even if they are. > > Mike > > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > > From: Bill! <[email protected]>; > To: <[email protected]>; > Subject: Re: [Zen] Posting and Replying Policy - Draft > Sent: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 8:43:49 AM > > > Mike, > > I do think as soon as this policy is implemented that calling someone an > 'unconscionable snitch' would draw at least a warning. > > You could soften it by maybe asking, 'why is ABC complaining about something > that they do themselves', or something like that... > > ...Bill! > > --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@... wrote: > > > > Bill!,<br/><br/>>Here is another example of a personal attack with personal > > name calling. I suggest this poster...<br/><br/>>I suggest this is a good > > example of the type of post that...<br/><br/>>Here is another personal > > flame. Don't you agree this warrants MIke...<br/><br/>>Here is another > > example of...<br/><br/>Are the words 'unconscionable snitch' now part of > > the new unacceptable language policy? If they are I won't use > > them.<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > > > > >
