Mike,

I do think as soon as this policy is implemented that calling someone an 
'unconscionable snitch' would draw at least a warning.

You could soften it by maybe asking, 'why is ABC complaining about something 
that they do themselves', or something like that...

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@... wrote:
>
> Bill!,<br/><br/>>Here is another example of a personal attack with personal 
> name calling. I suggest this poster...<br/><br/>>I suggest this is a good 
> example of the type of post that...<br/><br/>>Here is another personal flame. 
> Don't you agree this warrants MIke...<br/><br/>>Here is another example 
> of...<br/><br/>Are the words 'unconscionable snitch' now part of the new 
> unacceptable language policy? If they are I won't use 
> them.<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to