simon wrote: > Getting the information from ESX would probably be the most efficient, > however, also the most difficult since you would probably have to do custom > performance templates. Also you would probably have difficulties to setup > each VM as it's own device within Zenoss.
I thought that it wouldn't be so easy, but I had to ask if someone done it before. > > Getting the data from each VM image would be easier since you could treat > each VM as a regular host for which there are plenty of templates and > material available. So going to ESX directly is definitely the road less > traveled but could also bring rewards whereas going to each VM would be more > proven and tested. For monitoring each vm, what agent would you choose to use? The SNMP informant or something alike. Or is it possible to get statistics from wmi with perfmon or something like that? The agentless way would be a great way to travel, if it works.. -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=10755#10755 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
