jmp242 wrote: > > Talking about these things, I've sort of pointed at OCSNG and GLPI before, > but as they are OSS and already somewhat developed, maybe they ought to be > inspected before trying to write something from scratch? >
Thanks James. We've taken a quick look at OCS+GLPI and many others (GroundWork, Hyperic, Qlusters, Zenoss, COSMOS, OneCMDB, ZipTie, BCFG2, Centeris, OpenNMS, Wireshark, MRTG, cfEngine, Nagios). We're also considering commercial solutions or a mix-and-match from commercial and open source components. On the open source side, we're mainly considering Eclipse COSMOS and Zenoss Core as starting points toward a full CMDB solution. Anyway, the timing is googd to look at other solutions, so I'll take a second look at OCS and GLPI... Thanks again, Louis -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=13685#13685 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
