My understanding is that during modeling zenoss tries to match this interface to available templates, but defaults to ethernetcsmacd for the profile even if the "type" is different. A nice community effort would be a better group of templates for common interface types considering how many people have been affected by the "bad oid" issue recently (myself included).
-------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=18440#18440 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
