HerbertS wrote: > Make Zenoss ready for Windows infrastructures. > > 1.) Zenoss does neither scale/work acceptable if you try or use it with more > than 30 Windows servers on different locations (subnets). 30 servers are not > an enterprise environment, but it is definitely to much for zenoss/zenwin. > > 2.) Zenwin isn't stable for windows environments. It's not able to handle 60 > secs cycle intervals for these environments. Increasing interval let zenwin > die. Version of zenoss doesn't matter. Cron'ing 60 mins schedule as work > around doesn't make me happy. > > 3.) Windows Server 2008 is a common OS which Zenoss does not support. I like > to see support for Windows OS during beta not 12 months after OS has been > released. > > Without any doubt, Zenoss 2.2 works great for monitoring network/snmp devices > and IX devices. But, at the moment it's definitely limited to these systems. > > I like to see this great software to work for all platforms.
Definitely agreed to this, agentless Windows infrastructure integration is the main point of using zenoss instead nagios etc which would be much stabler. Additionally, database integrity should be better. All together, don't make any new features before you can get zenoss *much* more stable than now. At the moment, Zenoss takes more hours than it saves. -- -Mf2 -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=22222#22222 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
