On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:37 AM, slmiller wrote:
That gets me most of the way there.
I do have one rule that does use a schedule. So I assume the warning
is because the object being copied will end up either pointing to a
non-existent schedule, or will attempt to point to the original
user's schedule, which is a security violation.
So, how deep is the problem to copy the schedule, and have the new
rule point to the copied schedule?
It is a pretty serious problem that will end up causing zenactions to
have problems and affect all alerting. You're right on the money with
what the solution is. We need to copy the schedules and link the
copied alerting rule to them, but we also need to make sure that we
don't copy the references to the existing schedules along with the
alerting rule.
I haven't gotten into it this far yet myself.
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
