Thanks Cluther, That gets me most of the way there.
I do have one rule that does use a schedule. So I assume the warning is because the object being copied will end up either pointing to a non-existent schedule, or will attempt to point to the original user's schedule, which is a security violation. So, how deep is the problem to copy the schedule, and have the new rule point to the copied schedule? Thanks again, -Scott -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=25124#25124 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
