Ok, fair enough. One last, hopefully idea generating, question. Is the alert & schedule a pretty opaque object, or is it possible to grab information from one object and create a new one "by hand" for the other user?
-Scott On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Chet Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:37 AM, slmiller wrote: > >> That gets me most of the way there. >> >> I do have one rule that does use a schedule. So I assume the warning is >> because the object being copied will end up either pointing to a >> non-existent schedule, or will attempt to point to the original user's >> schedule, which is a security violation. >> >> So, how deep is the problem to copy the schedule, and have the new rule >> point to the copied schedule? >> > > It is a pretty serious problem that will end up causing zenactions to have > problems and affect all alerting. You're right on the money with what the > solution is. We need to copy the schedules and link the copied alerting rule > to them, but we also need to make sure that we don't copy the references to > the existing schedules along with the alerting rule. > > I haven't gotten into it this far yet myself. > > > _______________________________________________ > zenoss-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users >
_______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
