I think they're already doing this in 2.4 betas? Or I saw it mentioned somewhere. I would think this could lead to issues with a) potentially much greater processing time needed to finish each event b) potential loops...
I like it otherwise. -- James Pulver Information Technology Area Supervisor LEPP Computer Group Cornell University rmatte wrote, On 4/29/2009 5:18 PM: > You should be able to transform an event, then create a completely separate > mapping and have it process that mapping as well, so that you don't run in to > this whole scenario where only 1 mapping runs. This would make the event > management system much easier to customize and much more powerful. > > > > > -------------------- m2f -------------------- > > Read this topic online here: > http://forums.zenoss.com/viewtopic.php?p=34043#34043 > > -------------------- m2f -------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > zenoss-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
