On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote:
> Does anyone see problems with this approach? Sorry, for some reason Mato's original email slipped past me... Mato, +1 on making zmq_term a blocking call. I'd probably make zmq_close a blocking call as well, and offer a socket option to disable this per socket. Do we have use cases for applications that need to kill 0MQ right away? I'd suggest that this can be done e.g. by destroying the context and not calling zmq_term(). -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev