Hi Вячеслав, > The main idea of adding HTTP proto support is to allow ZeroMQ peers to work > with each other throw the Firewalls. > Thank you for pointing me to some confusions in HTTP headers and logging > code I'll fix them asap.
I think it's a great idea and you've definitely started an active discussion here. But before submitting code, we need to agree on a design that works for us all. If we build HTTP support into 0MQ core, we'd have to do it using a real HTTP engine that is robust against attacks, can do HTTPS, does logging, authentication, etc. This is possible (e.g. we've integrated OpenPGM like that) but a lot of work. Making a bridge is a much easier starting point. The second aspect is to agree on semantics, e.g. how client applications speak to the HTTP server, and how this maps to 0MQ socket semantics. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
