On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://www.zeromq.org/docs:3-0 holds the proposals by various people, > mainly Martin Sustrik and myself. Personally I find POSIX > compatibility less important than simplicity at this stage, my main > complaint with the current message API (in C) is that it's too verbose > for simple applications. A further idea is to make a separate C binding, which can offer simpler APIs layered on top of a POSIX-compliant core API. This would let us evolve the C API without breaking other language bindings. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
