On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, I think the subsequent email about layering non-POSIX APIs on top of > POSIX APIs makes this discussion irrelevant, however, given that the > reationale behind zmq_msg_t design isn't documented anywhere, let me briefly > explain why sending and receiving functions use message objects (zmq_msg_t) > instead of raw buffers (void*)... These design goals are definitely worth documenting, either in the man pages, or on the wiki. Perhaps a zmq_msg[7] man page? I'll write that, based on your four points here, if you like. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
