On 04/03/2011 11:51 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> zmq_msg_t msg;
> zmq_msg_init (&msg, 0);  // instead of zmq_msg_init (&msg);
> zmq_recvmsg (s,&msg, 0);
>
> It does make receiving a message slightly weird, but it gives a single
> 'normal' init method, which is worth a lot IMO.

I am not against. The less functions the better. Let's see what others say.

Martin
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to