On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As for renaming zmq_msg_data to zmq_msg_zerocopy, I would say that the > actual semantics of the command is not "zero copy" but "user defined > allocator". This has to do with the custom allocation on recv() side (as > discussed recently on the list) as well. Let's see where the discussion > will head. > > Martin > > For my 2p, most of the people I see doing 0MQ with C/C++ are using init_data for exactly this, with some simple slab type memory scheme going on, and seeing notable speed improvements, so I think the practice is pretty widespread. Ian
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
