MS> As for renaming zmq_msg_data to zmq_msg_zerocopy, I would say that the MS> actual semantics of the command is not "zero copy" but "user defined MS> allocator". This has to do with the custom allocation on recv() side (as MS> discussed recently on the list) as well. Let's see where the discussion MS> will head.
"User defined allocator" seems much more meaningful to me. -- Gregg _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
