On 04/12/2011 04:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Hmm, industry practice is short option names ("SNDBUF"), so
> ZMQ_RECONNECT and ZMQ_RECONNECT_MAX would work better.
As the option is not part of POSIX, I have no opinion on this matter.
What do others think? Is shortening the option names worth of it? There
are couple of other long names out there, e.g. ZMQ_RECOVERY_IVL. Or even
ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE and ZMQ_UNSUBSCRIBE...
Martin
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
