>> Hmm, industry practice is short option names ("SNDBUF"), so
>> ZMQ_RECONNECT and ZMQ_RECONNECT_MAX would work better.MS> What do others think? Is shortening the option names worth of it? There MS> are couple of other long names out there, e.g. ZMQ_RECOVERY_IVL. Or even MS> ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE and ZMQ_UNSUBSCRIBE... If it's not used often, longer and more descriptive is better. I don't think adding a few letters makes it too long, and they do add some meaning. I think TIME might be more meaningful than IVL. I know what IVL means now, but it didn't have instant meaning to me when I first saw it. -- Gregg _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
