I agree, the message may be a bit harsh, since it should work fine on everything back to 2.1.0 (though it isn't actively tested all the way back).
How about: "Detected ZMQ version: <x>, but pyzmq is based on zmq <y>." "libzmq features and fixes introduced after <x> will be unavailable." -MinRK On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:40, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 20:41, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Building against 2.1.6 sounds like a bad idea - there's a pretty big bug in >> it, unless you've pulled patches separately? > > Yeah, the 2.1.6 we're distributing is patched up for #206. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
