On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 22:00, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, the message may be a bit harsh, since it should work fine on > everything back to 2.1.0 (though it isn't actively tested all the way > back). > > How about: > "Detected ZMQ version: <x>, but pyzmq is based on zmq <y>." > "libzmq features and fixes introduced after <x> will be unavailable."
Looks great! I think "based on" is a little bit weird in this context, maybe we could find some other wording for that? Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
