On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 13:26, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 22:00, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree, the message may be a bit harsh, since it should work fine on >> everything back to 2.1.0 (though it isn't actively tested all the way >> back). >> >> How about: >> "Detected ZMQ version: <x>, but pyzmq is based on zmq <y>." >> "libzmq features and fixes introduced after <x> will be unavailable." > > Looks great! I think "based on" is a little bit weird in this context, > maybe we could find some other wording for that?
'targets' is probably more conventional. Thanks! > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
