On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
>> In terms of backwards compatibility, it seems the best we can do is >> add a version header to the protocol, and check this in 2.1 and later >> branches. > > That would break backward compatibility in 2.1 series. No, it would not. Please read again, repeat until it's clear. :-) > Yes for 3.0. 2.2 is up to you. 2.2 is up to demand, if there's no-one who wants that space (mix of stable and experimental), I'm willing to drop it in favor of 3.0. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
