On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Martin Pales <[email protected]> wrote:
> regarding the (lack of) version number and exchange/validation of content > type in the protocol draft I would propose to follow the draft of the SPDY > protocol where this is pretty well addressed. Could you point to the specific sections where this is addressed? A quick reading didn't show anything obvious. It could be fun to use SPDY, certainly, especially to multiplex many 0MQ dialogs over a single SPDY stream. I'm working on a design for userspace transports to plug into 0MQ, and SPDY would be a nice use case. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
