On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Martin Pales <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are separate control frames and data frames. Control frames contain > version and type. I guess it's nicer in some ways than a separate version header. How about versioning data frames? > http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol/spdy-protocol-draft1#framing > Very similar to the greeting and content in the ZMTP/1.1 draft. Both > version and peer type could be added to the greeting message. Indeed. > Another way would be to add this kind of session layer for multiplexing > directly into zeromq, since SPDY implementations are very rare. Well, multiplexing seems like a good idea but in practice... we've not had great experience with it. I'd probably use it only for bridging. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
