[email protected] said:
> So, in summary, let's cut the philosophy and focus on targeted
> *minimal* patches to solve identified problems.
+1, although "minimal" is a matter of opinion.
Pieter, with all due respect, it's a shame that this community is turning
into one driven by personal ideology rather than a meritocracy based on
quality *technical* contributions. That was not what I signed up for when I
started contributing to this project.
Maybe you could also tone down the ideology a couple of points?
> I repeat the word *minimal* for emphasis. If you are spending fifteen
> emails arguing a design, it isn't minimal.
Such as your design of defaulting to ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE ("") for SUB sockets?
-mato
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
