On Feb 3, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Christian Martinez wrote:

> First, I have to make a disclaimer that everything I'm about to say is my 
> opinion only and does not reflect any official MSFT position.
> 
> Personally I love the give and take and don't feel threatened or upset by any 
> of the shenanigans. I find them a natural part of the OSS process. Before I 
> joined the monolith I used to work exclusively in the OSS world using things 
> like ACE/TAO, MICO, every Java framework imaginable etc... There was never a 
> shortage of interesting discussions/rants.  
> 
> What I've observed is that every one of the projects that were successful had 
> a benevolent dictator and a few hard core contributors. As long as that basic 
> infrastructure is there and passion remains then I feel comfortable telling 
> as many folks as possible to check out 0MQ. We've embraced Node and Hadoop 
> very publicly as a company and work deeply with those projects. I'd love it 
> if someday we can do that with 0MQ as well. 

Your experience with OSS mirrors mine (benevolent dictator plus a few hard-core 
contributors). With 0mq we are trying to modify that a bit where there is no 
benevolent dictator and we want a lot more than just a "few" hard-core 
contributors. :)


> If you're concerned with stability take a branch/build, stick to that and 
> maybe pick up a support contract especially if you're restricted to binary 
> only... 

For anyone relying on this for production, this is a good idea. Either pick up 
a paid contract *or* become a contributor and help guide the evolution. A 
completely hands-off approach is likely to leave you dissatisfied in the long 
run.


> Well that's enough pontificating ....I'll go back to hacking the broken Node 
> binding now (It breaks under Node's move to libuv ...nothing really to do 
> with 0MQ which I'm barred from hacking directly :(   ) 

So sad. The library needs some serious love on the Windows platform (ipc 
transport, zmq_poll, etc) but most of the contributors are UNIX-only. Please do 
some lobbying if you can!

cr


_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to