Why not make it allowed in a future version? It doesn't seem any more unusual than other mixings.
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:32:33 PM Chuck Remes wrote: > No, do not do this. If it works at all right now, it will break in a future > library release when the wire protocol enforces peer socket type checking. > ROUTER -> ROUTER is fine as is ROUTER -> DEALER. > > Alternately, do PUB -> SUB. As of libzmq 3.2, the publisher filters out the > outgoing messages so only those SUBs that have subscribed to the message > will receive it. This will require you to add a subscription string as the > first message part for all outgoing messages so the socket can filter it. > > Please read the guide if this doesn't make sense to you yet. There are lots > of great examples with code. > > cr > > On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Justin Karneges <[email protected]> wrote: > > Inspired by the PUSH/ROUTER question a moment ago, I wonder if it ought to > > be possible to match ROUTER and PULL, for one-way directed communication? > > > > Currently I am using ROUTER->ROUTER for this, and the receiver just > > ignores > > the envelope. Being able to make the receiver PULL seems like it would be > > more natural. > > > > Justin > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
